Against Integrative Bargaining

نویسندگان

  • Russell Korobkin
  • Richard E. Walton
چکیده

Integrative bargaining, also known as “problem-solving,” “value-creating,” or “win-win” negotiation, is the centerpiece of normative negotiation scholarship and negotiation teaching. It has held this position at least since the publication of “Getting to Yes” by Fisher and Ury in 1981, and perhaps since the publication of “A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations” by Walton and McKersie in 1965. To begin, let me admit that the title of this essay is somewhat misleading, or at least lacks the subtlety that I hope to convey. I am not really against integrative bargaining, by which I mean structuring negotiated agreements in such a way as to increase the joint value of a deal to the participating parties. As a matter of fact, I’m firmly in favor of it. Through integrative bargaining, negotiators can make everyone involved in a transaction better off than they would otherwise be. But the value of integrative bargaining, although substantial, has been oversold. This is true, I believe, with regard to negotiation generally, and especially concerning legal negotiations, the term I use for the negotiation contexts in which lawyers most

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Effectiveness of Group Support Systems for Negotiation versus Idea- Generation Tasks: An Experimental Investigation

Various forms of computer-based group support systems are now commercially available. These systems can be used for a wide range of decision-making tasks. The current study compares the performance of teams meeting face-to-face and teams meeting via a computer-based system in the context of tasks that are at opposite ends of McGrath’s (1984) “task circumplex.” Two tasks are employed—an integrat...

متن کامل

Mental contrasting promotes integrative bargaining

Purpose This paper aims to test the impact of several self-regulatory strategies on an integrative bargaining task. Designlmethodology/approach Participants were randomly assigned to dyads and negotiated over the sale of a car. Before negotiating, participants were prompted to engage in one of three self-regulation strategies, based upon fantasy realization theory (FRT): to mentally contrast a ...

متن کامل

Computer-supported negotiations: an experimental study of bargaining in electronic commerce

The expanding business-to-business (B2B) e-commerce market has created a need for firms to negotiate business deals online. Negotiation support tools are likely to play a more critical role in B2B e-commerce. Notwithstanding their importance, the impacts of negotiation support tools (especially automated bargaining agents) are not well understood. This research addresses this gap by conducting ...

متن کامل

Value Creation and Value Appropriation: An Integrative, Multi-Level Framework

Value creation by individuals and firms plays a central role in the evolution of populations by enabling adaptive efficiency. Once created, value may become embedded in resources which require deployment for value to be appropriated. Value appropriation is a two-step process through which a firm first competes against other firms to create and protect appropriation streams (i.e., inter-organiza...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2008